Aiper Scuba X1 vs Beatbot Sora 70
Technical comparison · Pool cleaning robots
Only Beatbot Sora 70 shows a measurable advantage, starting with runtime (cordless models); on the other available specs the data does not separate the two models. On the category's technical index, Beatbot Sora 70 ranks #6 of 13, Aiper Scuba X1 #11.
| Parameter |
Scuba X1
Aiper
F2 · Intermediate
|
Sora 70
Beatbot
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price | — | ~1000–2200 € |
| Category specs | ||
| Pool type | In ground | — |
| Surfaces cleaned | Floor, Walls, Waterline | Floor, Walls, Waterline |
| Power source | Cordless, battery powered | Cordless, battery powered |
| Maximum pool area | 200 m² | — |
| Runtime (cordless models) | 180 min | 300 min |
| Charging time | 240 min | — |
| Filtration fineness | 3 µm | 150 µm |
| Filter basket capacity | 5 l | 6 l |
| Works offline | — | Yes |
| Filtration flow rate | — | 429 l/min |
| App | — | Beatbot App |
The differences that matter
- Runtime (cordless models): Aiper Scuba X1 180 min vs Beatbot Sora 70 300 min
- Filter basket capacity: Aiper Scuba X1 5 l vs Beatbot Sora 70 6 l
In short
Beatbot Sora 70
Measurable advantages: runtime (cordless models) and filter basket capacity.
This comparison points to the two product pages, where you'll find the complete data and the official links.