Beatbot Sora 30 vs Mammotion SPINO E1
Technical comparison · Pool cleaning robots
Only Beatbot Sora 30 shows a measurable advantage, starting with runtime (cordless models); on the other available specs the data does not separate the two models. On the category's technical index, Beatbot Sora 30 ranks #7 of 14, Mammotion SPINO E1 #14.
| Parameter |
Sora 30
Beatbot
F2 · Intermediate
|
SPINO E1
Mammotion
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Awards | — | |
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | 2026 | — |
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price | ~450–1000 € | ~450–1000 € |
| Category specs | ||
| Surfaces cleaned | Floor, Walls, Waterline | Floor, Walls, Waterline |
| Power source | Cordless, battery powered | Cordless, battery powered |
| Maximum pool area | — | 149 m² |
| Runtime (cordless models) | 300 min | 210 min |
| Filtration fineness | 150 µm | 180 µm |
| Filter basket capacity | 5 l | — |
| Works offline | Yes | — |
| Filtration flow rate | 429 l/min | — |
| Navigation system | — | Optimised path |
| How it is retrieved from the water | — | Parks itself at the waterline |
| App | Beatbot App | — |
CobotCompare Awards
Beatbot Sora 30
Best value Intermediate
Best ratio of technical score to price among the 9 sheets in the Pool cleaning robots category (intermediate tier): technical score 94/100. The price used is the sheet's estimated range.
How we assign awards →Mammotion SPINO E1
No awards in this tier.
The differences that matter
- Runtime (cordless models): Beatbot Sora 30 300 min vs Mammotion SPINO E1 210 min
In short
This comparison points to the two product pages, where you'll find the complete data and the official links.