Aiper Scuba X1 vs Beatbot Sora 30
Technical comparison · Pool cleaning robots
Only Beatbot Sora 30 shows a measurable advantage, starting with runtime (cordless models); on the other available specs the data does not separate the two models. On the category's technical index, Beatbot Sora 30 ranks #7 of 13, Aiper Scuba X1 #11.
| Parameter |
Scuba X1
Aiper
F2 · Intermediate
|
Sora 30
Beatbot
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Awards | — | |
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | — | 2026 |
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price | — | ~450–1000 € |
| Category specs | ||
| Pool type | In ground | — |
| Surfaces cleaned | Floor, Walls, Waterline | Floor, Walls, Waterline |
| Power source | Cordless, battery powered | Cordless, battery powered |
| Maximum pool area | 200 m² | — |
| Runtime (cordless models) | 180 min | 300 min |
| Charging time | 240 min | — |
| Filtration fineness | 3 µm | 150 µm |
| Filter basket capacity | 5 l | 5 l |
| Works offline | — | Yes |
| Filtration flow rate | — | 429 l/min |
| App | — | Beatbot App |
CobotCompare Awards
Aiper Scuba X1
No awards in this tier.
Beatbot Sora 30
Best value Intermediate
Best ratio of technical score to price among the 9 sheets in the Pool cleaning robots category (intermediate tier): technical score 94/100. The price used is the sheet's estimated range.
How we assign awards →The differences that matter
- Runtime (cordless models): Aiper Scuba X1 180 min vs Beatbot Sora 30 300 min
In short
This comparison points to the two product pages, where you'll find the complete data and the official links.