Aiper Scuba S1 vs WYBOT S2 Solar Vision
Technical comparison · Pool cleaning robots
Both clean floor, walls and waterline without a cable; what changes is how long they work: 270 minutes declared for the Aiper Scuba S1, 150 for the WYBOT S2 Solar Vision (manufacturer values). The second sits in a high price range and carries an onboard camera.
| Parameter | ||
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F3 — Advanced |
| Price | ||
| Price | — | ~1000–2200 € |
| Category specs | ||
| Surfaces cleaned | Floor, Walls, Waterline | Floor, Walls, Waterline |
| Power source | Cordless, battery powered | Cordless, battery powered |
| Onboard camera | — | Yes |
| Maximum pool area | — | 300 m² |
| Runtime (cordless models) | 270 min | 150 min |
| Filtration fineness | 3 µm | 180 µm |
| Navigation system | Optimised path | — |
| App | Aiper | — |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Software notes | The Aiper app is used to choose cleaning modes, set the weekly schedule, monitor performance and receive OTA updates. | — |
The differences that matter
- Runtime: 270 vs 150 minutes → the Scuba S1 works almost twice as long before it needs charging.
- Filtration fineness: 3 µm vs 180 µm → the Scuba S1's filter is declared for much finer particles.
In short
Aiper Scuba S1
A pool that needs a long cycle before the robot goes back on charge: 270 minutes against 150. The filter is declared at 3 µm, for particles much smaller than the S2's 180 µm, and the weekly schedule is set from the Aiper app.
WYBOT S2 Solar Vision
A large pool, up to a declared 300 m², with an onboard camera. The trade-off is a shorter cycle, 150 minutes, and a filter declared at 180 µm.
Where to buy
The purchase links are the same as on the two product pages and don't influence the verdict. The product pages have the complete data.