Ecovacs GOAT A2000 LiDAR PRO vs Mammotion YUKA mini 2 1000H
Technical comparison · Robot lawn mowers
Ecovacs GOAT A2000 LiDAR PRO and Mammotion YUKA mini 2 1000H sit in the same category (robot lawn mowers). Ecovacs GOAT A2000 LiDAR PRO is ahead on: maximum slope. Mammotion YUKA mini 2 1000H is ahead on: mowing time per charge. On the category's technical index, Mammotion YUKA mini 2 1000H ranks #4 of 12, Ecovacs GOAT A2000 LiDAR PRO #6.
| Parameter |
GOAT A2000 LiDAR PRO
Ecovacs
F2 · Intermediate
|
YUKA mini 2 1000H
Mammotion
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price | ~1000–2200 € | ~1000–2200 € |
| Universal specs | ||
| Weight | 17.8 kg | — |
| Category specs | ||
| Boundary wire required | — | No |
| Navigation system | LiDAR | LiDAR |
| Maximum slope | 50 % | 45 % |
| Cutting width | 32.9 cm | — |
| Cutting height, minimum | 30 mm | — |
| Cutting height, maximum | 90 mm | — |
| Mowing time per charge | 50 min | 150 min |
| Charging time | 50 min | — |
| Battery capacity | 3 Ah | 6.1 Ah |
| IP rating | IPX6 | — |
| Obstacle avoidance | LiDAR | — |
| Weight | 17.8 kg | — |
The differences that matter
- Mowing time per charge: Ecovacs GOAT A2000 LiDAR PRO 50 min vs Mammotion YUKA mini 2 1000H 150 min
- Maximum slope: Ecovacs GOAT A2000 LiDAR PRO 50 % vs Mammotion YUKA mini 2 1000H 45 %
In short
Ecovacs GOAT A2000 LiDAR PRO
Measurable advantages: maximum slope. «Measure the slope at the steepest point of the lawn, not on average, and remember the declared figure assumes dry grass in ideal conditions. If the lawn comes close to this value you need headroom: a mower at its limit slips and leaves strips of uncut grass.»
Mammotion YUKA mini 2 1000H
Measurable advantages: mowing time per charge.
This comparison points to the two product pages, where you'll find the complete data and the official links.