Aiper Scuba S1 vs Beatbot Sora 30
Technical comparison · Pool cleaning robots
Only Beatbot Sora 30 shows a measurable advantage, starting with runtime (cordless models); on the other available specs the data does not separate the two models. On the category's technical index, Beatbot Sora 30 ranks #7 of 13, Aiper Scuba S1 #10.
| Parameter |
Scuba S1
Aiper
F2 · Intermediate
|
Sora 30
Beatbot
F2 · Intermediate
|
|---|---|---|
| Awards | — | |
| Identity | ||
| Launch year | — | 2026 |
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price | — | ~450–1000 € |
| Category specs | ||
| Surfaces cleaned | Floor, Walls, Waterline | Floor, Walls, Waterline |
| Power source | Cordless, battery powered | Cordless, battery powered |
| Runtime (cordless models) | 270 min | 300 min |
| Filtration fineness | 3 µm | 150 µm |
| Filter basket capacity | — | 5 l |
| Works offline | — | Yes |
| Filtration flow rate | — | 429 l/min |
| Navigation system | Optimised path | — |
| App | Aiper | Beatbot App |
| Ecosystem | ||
| Software notes | The Aiper app is used to choose cleaning modes, set the weekly schedule, monitor performance and receive OTA updates. | — |
CobotCompare Awards
Aiper Scuba S1
No awards in this tier.
Beatbot Sora 30
Best value Intermediate
Best ratio of technical score to price among the 9 sheets in the Pool cleaning robots category (intermediate tier): technical score 94/100. The price used is the sheet's estimated range.
How we assign awards →The differences that matter
- Runtime (cordless models): Aiper Scuba S1 270 min vs Beatbot Sora 30 300 min
In short
This comparison points to the two product pages, where you'll find the complete data and the official links.