Mammotion YUKA mini 2 1000H vs Worx Landroid Vision Cloud

Technical comparison · Robot lawn mowers

In brief

Mammotion YUKA mini 2 1000H is ahead on maximum slope; beyond that the two models differ in navigation system: design differences, not a ranking. On the category's technical index, Mammotion YUKA mini 2 1000H ranks #4 of 15, Worx Landroid Vision Cloud #15.

Parameter
Identity
Use tier F2 — Intermediate F3 — Advanced
Price
Price ~1000–2200 € —
Universal specs
Dimensions (W×D×H) — 53.1 × 61.5 × 28.2 cm
Weight — 14.06 kg
Category specs
Boundary wire required No No
Navigation system LiDAR RTK-GNSS with cameras
Onboard camera — Yes
Maximum slope 45 % 30 %
Cutting width — 22.1 cm
Cutting height, minimum — 40 mm
Cutting height, maximum — 90 mm
Number of blades — 3
Mowing time per charge 150 min —
Charging time — 100 min
Battery capacity 6.1 Ah 5 Ah
Rain sensor — Yes
Obstacle avoidance — Cameras
Connectivity — Bluetooth, Wi-Fi
Weight — 14.06 kg
Ecosystem
Software notes — The robot is managed from the app, with multiple zones and scheduling. It connects via Bluetooth and Wi-Fi. Updates arrive over the air or by USB. The RTK Cloud service is free for life.

The differences that matter

  • Maximum slope: Mammotion YUKA mini 2 1000H 45 % vs Worx Landroid Vision Cloud 30 %
  • Navigation system: Mammotion YUKA mini 2 1000H LiDAR · Worx Landroid Vision Cloud RTK-GNSS with cameras

In short

Mammotion YUKA mini 2 1000H

Measurable advantages: maximum slope. «Measure the slope at the steepest point of the lawn, not on average, and remember the declared figure assumes dry grass in ideal conditions. If the lawn comes close to this value you need headroom: a mower at its limit slips and leaves strips of uncut grass.»

See the Mammotion YUKA mini 2 1000H sheet →

Worx Landroid Vision Cloud

Design differences: navigation system: rTK-GNSS with cameras.

See the Worx Landroid Vision Cloud sheet →

This comparison points to the two product pages, where you'll find the complete data and the official links.