Ecovacs GOAT A2000 LiDAR PRO vs Worx Landroid Vision AI

Technical comparison · Robot lawn mowers

In brief

Ecovacs GOAT A2000 LiDAR PRO is ahead on maximum slope; beyond that the two models differ in iP rating and obstacle avoidance: design differences, not a ranking. On the category's technical index, Ecovacs GOAT A2000 LiDAR PRO ranks #6 of 12, Worx Landroid Vision AI #8.

Parameter
Worx Landroid Vision AI Landroid Vision AI Worx F2 · Intermediate
Identity
Use tier F2 — Intermediate F2 — Intermediate
Price
Price ~1000–2200 € —
Universal specs
Weight 17.8 kg 15.1 kg
Category specs
Boundary wire required — No
Navigation system LiDAR —
Onboard camera — Yes
Maximum slope 50 % 30 %
Cutting width 32.9 cm —
Cutting height, minimum 30 mm 38 mm
Cutting height, maximum 90 mm 89 mm
Guaranteed sound power level — 59 dB(A)
Mowing time per charge 50 min —
Charging time 50 min —
Battery capacity 3 Ah 4 Ah
IP rating IPX6 IPX5
App — Landroid
Rain sensor — Yes
Obstacle avoidance LiDAR Cameras
Connectivity — Wi-Fi, Bluetooth
Weight 17.8 kg 15.1 kg

The differences that matter

  • Maximum slope: Ecovacs GOAT A2000 LiDAR PRO 50 % vs Worx Landroid Vision AI 30 %
  • IP rating: Ecovacs GOAT A2000 LiDAR PRO IPX6 · Worx Landroid Vision AI IPX5
  • Obstacle avoidance: Ecovacs GOAT A2000 LiDAR PRO LiDAR · Worx Landroid Vision AI Cameras

In short

Ecovacs GOAT A2000 LiDAR PRO

Measurable advantages: maximum slope. «Measure the slope at the steepest point of the lawn, not on average, and remember the declared figure assumes dry grass in ideal conditions. If the lawn comes close to this value you need headroom: a mower at its limit slips and leaves strips of uncut grass.»

See the Ecovacs GOAT A2000 LiDAR PRO sheet →

Worx Landroid Vision AI

Design differences: iP rating: iPX5.

See the Worx Landroid Vision AI sheet →

This comparison points to the two product pages, where you'll find the complete data and the official links.