Mammotion SPINO E1 vs WYBOT C2
Technical comparison · Pool cleaning robots
SPINO E1 and C2 sit in the same price range and clean the same surfaces: floor, walls and waterline. The difference that decides is pool size: 149 m² declared for SPINO E1, 200 m² for C2.
| Parameter | ||
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F2 — Intermediate |
| Price | ||
| Price | ~450–1000 € | ~450–1000 € |
| Universal specs | ||
| Weight | — | 7.98 kg |
| Category specs | ||
| Pool type | — | Above ground, In ground |
| Surfaces cleaned | Floor, Walls, Waterline | Floor, Walls, Waterline |
| Power source | Cordless, battery powered | Cordless, battery powered |
| Maximum pool area | 149 m² | 200 m² |
| Runtime (cordless models) | 210 min | 180 min |
| Charging time | — | 180 min |
| Filtration fineness | 180 µm | 10 µm |
| Filter basket capacity | — | 3 l |
| Navigation system | Optimised path | — |
| How it is retrieved from the water | Parks itself at the waterline | Parks itself at the waterline |
| Weight | — | 7.98 kg |
The differences that matter
- Area 149 m² vs 200 m² → beyond 149 m² SPINO E1 is outside its declared figure.
- Runtime 210 min vs 180 min → half an hour more per cycle on SPINO E1.
- Filtration 180 µm vs 10 µm → C2 traps much smaller particles.
In short
Mammotion SPINO E1
By the manufacturer's declared figures, SPINO E1 runs cycles of up to 210 minutes on an optimised path, suited to a home-sized pool within 149 m². The trade-off is that limit and a 180 µm filter, coarser than C2's.
WYBOT C2
A pool of up to 200 m² falls within C2's declared figure, and it also has a 10 µm filter for finer particles. The cost is 180 minutes of runtime, thirty fewer than SPINO E1.
Where to buy
The purchase links are the same as on the two product pages and don't influence the verdict. The product pages have the complete data.