Beatbot Sora 70 vs WYBOT S2 Solar Vision
Technical comparison · Pool cleaning robots
Two battery-powered pool robots in the same estimated price band, both cleaning floor, walls and waterline. What separates them is stated runtime (300 minutes against 150) and the on-board camera on the WYBOT.
| Parameter | ||
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F3 — Advanced |
| Price | ||
| Price | ~1000–2200 € | ~1000–2200 € |
| Category specs | ||
| Surfaces cleaned | Floor, Walls, Waterline | Floor, Walls, Waterline |
| Power source | Cordless, battery powered | Cordless, battery powered |
| Onboard camera | — | Yes |
| Maximum pool area | — | 300 m² |
| Runtime (cordless models) | 300 min | 150 min |
| Filtration fineness | 150 µm | 180 µm |
| Filter basket capacity | 6 l | — |
| Works offline | Yes | — |
| Filtration flow rate | 429 l/min | — |
| App | Beatbot App | — |
The differences that matter
- Runtime: 300 minutes (Beatbot) against 150 (WYBOT) → a large pool is cleaned with fewer stops to recharge.
- Filtration: 150 µm against 180 µm → Beatbot declares finer filtration.
In short
Beatbot Sora 70
Suits anyone cleaning a large pool who wants as few interruptions as possible: stated runtime goes up to 300 minutes, the filter basket holds 6 l and the stated filtration flow is 429 l/min (values declared by the manufacturer). Filtration goes down to 150 µm (the lower the number, the finer the particles trapped) and the robot also works without a connection. The trade-off: giving up the on-board camera the other model declares.
WYBOT S2 Solar Vision
Suits anyone who wants an on-board camera on a robot for pools up to 300 m². The trade-off: stated runtime is 150 minutes and filtration goes down to 180 µm, so slightly larger particles.
Where to buy
Paid link: the price for you does not change.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
The purchase links are the same as on the two product pages and don't influence the verdict. The product pages have the complete data.