Beatbot AquaSense 2 vs Mammotion SPINO E1

Technical comparison · Pool cleaning robots

In brief

Beatbot AquaSense 2 is ahead on maximum pool area; beyond that the two models differ in navigation system: design differences, not a ranking. On the category's technical index, Beatbot AquaSense 2 ranks #8 of 14, Mammotion SPINO E1 #14.

Parameter
Beatbot AquaSense 2 AquaSense 2 Beatbot F2 · Intermediate
Mammotion SPINO E1 SPINO E1 Mammotion F2 · Intermediate
Identity
Use tier F2 — Intermediate F2 — Intermediate
Price
Price — ~450–1000 €
Universal specs
Dimensions (W×D×H) 43.5 × 45.1 × 23.3 cm —
Weight 10.47 kg —
Category specs
Surfaces cleaned Floor, Walls, Waterline Floor, Walls, Waterline
Power source Cordless, battery powered Cordless, battery powered
Maximum pool area 300 m² 149 m²
Runtime (cordless models) 240 min 210 min
Charging time 240 min —
Filtration fineness 150 µm 180 µm
Filter basket capacity 2 l —
Navigation system Sonar mapping Optimised path
How it is retrieved from the water Parks itself at the waterline Parks itself at the waterline
Maximum pool depth 3 m —
Weight 10.47 kg —
Wi-Fi bands 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz —

The differences that matter

  • Maximum pool area: Beatbot AquaSense 2 300 m² vs Mammotion SPINO E1 149 m²
  • Runtime (cordless models): Beatbot AquaSense 2 240 min vs Mammotion SPINO E1 210 min
  • Navigation system: Beatbot AquaSense 2 Sonar mapping · Mammotion SPINO E1 Optimised path

In short

Beatbot AquaSense 2

Measurable advantages: maximum pool area and runtime (cordless models).

See the Beatbot AquaSense 2 sheet →

Mammotion SPINO E1

Design differences: navigation system: optimised path.

See the Mammotion SPINO E1 sheet →

This comparison points to the two product pages, where you'll find the complete data and the official links.