Aiper Scuba X1 vs Beatbot AquaSense X
Technical comparison · Pool cleaning robots
Beatbot AquaSense X is ahead on runtime (cordless models); beyond that the two models differ in pool type: design differences, not a ranking. On the category's technical index, Beatbot AquaSense X ranks #5 of 8, Aiper Scuba X1 #8.
| Parameter |
Scuba X1
Aiper
F2 · Intermediate
|
AquaSense X
Beatbot
F3 · Advanced
|
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Use tier | F2 — Intermediate | F3 — Advanced |
| Price | ||
| Price | — | ~2200–5000 € |
| Universal specs | ||
| Dimensions (W×D×H) | — | 44.2 × 43.9 × 28.4 cm |
| Weight | — | 13.1 kg |
| Category specs | ||
| Pool type | In ground | Above ground, In ground |
| Surfaces cleaned | Floor, Walls, Waterline | Floor, Walls, Waterline |
| Power source | Cordless, battery powered | Cordless, battery powered |
| Onboard camera | — | Yes |
| Maximum pool area | 200 m² | — |
| Runtime (cordless models) | 180 min | 300 min |
| Charging time | 240 min | 270 min |
| Filtration fineness | 3 µm | 150 µm |
| Filter basket capacity | 5 l | 5 l |
| Filtration flow rate | — | 429 l/min |
| Weight | — | 13.1 kg |
| App | — | Beatbot App |
The differences that matter
- Runtime (cordless models): Aiper Scuba X1 180 min vs Beatbot AquaSense X 300 min
- Pool type: Aiper Scuba X1 In ground · Beatbot AquaSense X Above ground, In ground
In short
Beatbot AquaSense X
Measurable advantages: runtime (cordless models).
This comparison points to the two product pages, where you'll find the complete data and the official links.